Home Today The Neo-Neo Debate in Understanding the Geopolitics of Outer House

The Neo-Neo Debate in Understanding the Geopolitics of Outer House


Outer area is creating as the following area of Geopolitics on this century. House exploration, which started after the Nineteen Fifties initially benefitted the scientific world. Later the elevated dependence on outer area by the space-faring nations, for surveillance, reconnaissance, and telecommunication functions in a technique or one other elevated the nation’s satisfaction. Quickly, the outer area created an impression within the area of geopolitics. With the growing impression of outer area in geopolitics and the numerous theories which have been put ahead by students like Everett Dolman and David Deudney, outer area is as we speak thought-about as the following vital area. Many Worldwide Relations theories have been explaining this creating area of geopolitics with various views. On this level, the truth that when one considers the geopolitics of outer area, it is rather evident that occasions within the area could be nicely defined in a neo-realist perspective, the place the nations are competing for energy, somewhat than the neo-liberal perspective, the place the cooperation between the nations is given extra emphasis. Since outer area is taken into account as an evolving and dynamic area the relevance of the neo-realism and neoliberalism debate gathers a lot significance. House is an entity that may be a supply of a large number of potential interpretations which are ambiguous or incompatible, and these differing interpretations led to the event of various political interpretations. It has been argued by students that no real “debate” as such has been executed within the area, associated to the theories of Worldwide Relations, besides neo-realism and neo-liberalism debate; however, the concept of clearly distinct theories is analytically helpful in permitting comparability of various views and relating them to totally different coverage implications.[1]

Neo-realism and neo-liberalism are the 2 primary theoretical paradigms in Worldwide Relations. Neo-realism put forth by Kenneth Waltz argues that states deeply care concerning the stability of energy and compete amongst themselves both to realize energy on the expense of others or at the least to verify they don’t lose energy. Alternatively, the central concern of neoliberalism entails methods to obtain cooperation amongst states and different actors within the worldwide system. Based on Keohane, he argues that “the insurance policies adopted by one authorities are regarded by its companions as facilitating the belief of their very own targets.” Each being state-centric, has issues relating to the reason of stability inside an anarchical system. Whereas neo-liberalism helps cooperation between the states via worldwide establishments, neo-realism stands for cooperation, with relative acquire between them within the worldwide system. Whereas neo-realist seems for energy in anarchy, neo-liberals view cooperation as a key to outlive in a greater approach and prosper in anarchy. Wendt’s assertion positive aspects a lot significance, as in each instances, sure roles and behaviors dominate the system at totally different factors of time.[2] Whereas the highly effective states have been focusing a lot on competitors in outer area, alongside cooperating with different nations, with their elevated technological, scientific, monetary, and political capabilities, these states who thought concerning the sensible applicability of the area actions, had a contrasting emphasis on cooperation. 

Key parts of Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism debate:

Because the identify suggests, the neo-neo debate in Worldwide Relations is a debate that exists between the students of neo-realist and neo-liberal theories. Although the students on either side of the controversy pursue totally different opinions, it can’t be argued that the controversy is totally between two polar-opposite worldviews. They share assumptions that concentrate on related questions and so they agree on a really related though-not an identical set of assumptions, that’s, briefly, there exists each similarities and disparities between neo-realism and neo-liberalism.3 Nevertheless, in response to the arguments made by the students, the one important achievement of this debate is the detailed evaluation of each theories and what either side perceives to be faults of the opposite.[3] Neo-realists and neo-liberal institutionalists attain their conclusions from the structural situations set by an anarchic worldwide system. Additionally, neo-realists clarify that the battle happens as a result of absence of order throughout the states, whereas the neoliberals spotlight that the probabilities for cooperation is been constrained by anarchy however, it isn’t made inconceivable. One of many greatest factors throughout the neo-neo debate is the extent to which every of those two theories considers the notion of cooperation throughout the world methods.[4] The position of establishments additionally turns into important on this debate. Neo-liberals argue that even when anarchy constrains the necessity of the states to cooperate, they nonetheless can work collectively, with the help of worldwide establishments, which can be a approach of managing anarchy, by discovering frequent grounds in an effort to keep away from battle. Nevertheless, neo-realists have a tendency to treat the effectiveness of regimes as extra narrowly circumscribed and argue that worldwide establishments are unable to mitigate anarchy’s constraining results on inter-state cooperation.[5]

Kenneth Waltz has argued that within the absence of a better authority and the curiosity to outlive, states are left with the selection of competing for energy within the worldwide realm.[6] Being labeled as a “defensive realist”, Waltz additionally argues that the state shouldn’t search hegemony; however ought to make sure that different states aren’t gaining energy at their expense. Based on the neoliberal establishment, the idea of interdependence and the hegemonic stability are the 2 historic developments put forth by them. The idea of interdependence talks concerning the growth of frequent pursuits between the states that may be obtained via the profitable cooperation between states. Hegemonic stability talks concerning the totally different worldwide methods just like the United Nations, the place the nice energy states present stability, both via financial sources or others. The cross-national interplay between the states in neo-liberalism poses a problem to the authority of the governments. Robert Keohane has characterised his arguments of neoliberalism as a variant of realism in his e-book, After Hegemony (1984). This characterization initiated a scholarly debate between Robert Keohane and Joseph Grieco, over whether or not the neo-realist assumptions have been accurately adopted and utilized.[7]  This emerged because the neo-neo debate. 

Additionally it is necessary to guage the states’ behavioral mannequin underneath the neo-realist and neo-liberal establishments. It has been argued by students, from a neo-realist perspective, the neo-liberals see states as rational “egoistic worth maximizers” who’re involved about their very own positive aspects and losses and neo-realists insist that state’s willingness to cooperate is interdependent with how the opposite states additionally do and if different positive aspects extra, it would even diminish their willingness.[8] Additionally, whereas speaking concerning the state conduct underneath the neo-neo debate, it ought to be famous that the neoliberals contemplate absolute positive aspects, neo-realists search for relative positive aspects within the state. One other ingredient that distinguishes the neo-realists from the neo-liberal perspective is that neo-realists view battle as one thing which connotes the scenario of the state conduct whereas, the neoliberals determine cooperation largely, as a result of position performed by establishments and regimes. 

Each the establishments exist in an anarchic system, however as highlighted earlier the way in which they settle for anarchy is totally different. In neo-realism, the states should survive and should assume the worst concerning the intentions of different states and compete for energy with them, which means the safety dilemma. In neoliberalism, the anarchy is taken into account a vacuum, which have to be stuffed by processes and establishments.[9] On consolidating the a number of similarities and variations within the neo-realist and neo-liberal perspective, one can analyze it in a number of methods. Within the worldwide system the neo-liberals and neo-realists exist on the bottom of anarchy, however the ranges through which these establishments settle for anarchy differs. One can interpret the interactions between states in these establishments as both aggressive as in a neo-realist perspective or cooperative as in a neoliberal perspective. Neo-realists agree that cooperation is feasible between the states, the way in which neo-liberals contemplate. However not like the neo-liberals, neo-realists contemplate that this cooperation is troublesome to implement.  

As talked about earlier, neo-realists contemplate relative positive aspects in state conduct, whereas the neoliberals insist on absolute positive aspects, that are helpful to its members. Within the case of neorealism, as talked about earlier, relative acquire doesn’t imply gaining energy, but in addition making certain that different actors don’t acquire energy at their expense. In neo-liberalism, absolutely the acquire attained by cooperation between the states must be clear. The actors in neoliberalism use sport idea, just like the prisoner’s dilemma for making certain this transparency. Each neo-realists and neoliberal institutionalists contemplate nationwide energy and financial well-being as the most important priorities of a state. However neo-realist offers extra emphasis on nationwide energy, whereas the neo-liberals give extra significance to financial well-being. This may be given extra emphasis by the 2 historic growth put forth by neo-liberal establishments, the idea of interdependence, and hegemonic stability, the place in response to Mearsheimer financial self-interest is the motivation behind hegemonic stability.[10] Lastly, neo-realists acknowledge the affect and impression of worldwide organizations in worldwide relations however imagine that the neo-liberals exaggerate their significance.[11]

Anarchy is among the primary ideas that the neo-realism-neo-liberalism debate considers. Furthermore, the primary rivalry over the extent of cooperation and battle solely encompasses one dimension, whereas categorically leaving out a number of different angles.[12] The neo-realism-neoliberalism debate can’t be thought-about as a necessary debate in worldwide relations, however via the right acknowledgment of the constraints of the controversy and having its elementary assumptions challenged, the neo-neo debate can symbolize a helpful section among the many theories of worldwide relations. It’s the anarchic ordering precept of the worldwide construction that determines the neo-realist perspective within the neo-neo debate. On this context, you will need to perceive the offensive and defensive neo-realism which is a subset of the present offensive and defensive realism within the worldwide relations idea. Additionally, whereas explaining the neoliberal establishment, understanding the regime idea will allow one to grasp extra concerning the position of worldwide establishments and regimes in creating cooperation between the nations.   

Neorealism: Offensive and Defensive Realism

Neo-realism or structural realism explains the theories primarily based on anarchy and so they differ in analyzing how a lot of energy states want in anarchy. This has led to the event of a structural idea, which is split into two branches, defensive and offensive neo-realism. Defensive realism contends that states ought to purchase an applicable quantity of energy crucial for them to thrive.[13] Additionally, on this quest to amass energy, they need to not, nonetheless, maximize their relative energy. Offensive realism is when one state seeks energy and affect to realize safety via hegemony. Defensive realism emerges when the offensive realists upset the stability of energy idea via their aggressive hegemonic growth. Additionally, whereas defensive realism doesn’t deny the truth of interstate battle, nor that incentives for state growth do exist, it contends that these incentives are sporadic somewhat than endemic.[14] As a way to perceive the relation between offensive and defensive realism, it is usually necessary to concentrate on the Stability of Energy Idea. The stability of energy idea in worldwide relations argues that states can safe their survival by stopping some other state, by gaining sufficient navy energy to dominate all others. Based on this idea, the states can pursue a coverage of stability of energy in two methods: by growing their very own energy, as when partaking in an armaments race or within the aggressive acquisition of territory; or by including to their very own energy that of different states, as when embarking upon a coverage of alliances.[15]  

Neoliberalism: Regime Idea

As talked about earlier, regime idea is derived from neo-liberalism and it argues concerning the affect of worldwide regimes within the cooperation of states. Identical to the neo-liberal institutionalists, in addition they assume that cooperation is feasible within the anarchic system of states. Regime idea is an strategy throughout the worldwide relations idea, which argues concerning the cooperation between the states within the worldwide regimes, and the way they play a significant position in mitigating worldwide anarchy and overcoming numerous collective motion issues amongst states.  Completely different faculties of thought have numerous analytical approaches that exist throughout the regime idea. In neoliberalism, nonetheless, regimes are thought-about as the middle which facilitates worldwide cooperation and constrains the conduct of states.[16] Based on Stephen Krasner, the regime is known as a set of rules, norms, guidelines, and decision-making procedures round which actors’ expectations converge in a given space of worldwide relations.[17] Based on regime idea, regimes assist the actors to appreciate long-term objectives and promote construction and stabilize relations, which advantages all of its members. The speculation additionally argues within the distribution of energy amongst its member states. 

Neo-Liberal elements in Outer House Cooperation

Earlier than analyzing the assorted elements of neo-liberalism in outer area cooperation actions, it’s important to grasp the a number of organizations and treaties which have been shaped by the actors. When nations began to launch area autos and satellites for a lot of functions, safety points associated to outer area began to knock on the door. There are 5 primary treaties regarding outer area which have been handed by the United Nations, particularly Outer House Treaty (1967), Rescue Settlement (1968), Legal responsibility Conference (1972), Registration Conference (1976), and the Moon Settlement (1979). By 2000, PAROS, Prevention of Arms Race in Outer House was additionally signed by the nations, underneath the United Nations. Other than these, there’s a committee within the United Nations, referred to as the Committee on the Peaceable Makes use of of Outer House (COPUOS) and the United Nations Workplace for Outer House Affairs (UNOOSA), which is part of the United Nations Secretariat. Additionally, establishments just like the European House Company (ESA), which comes underneath the European Union, is a significant instance of cooperative actions among the many nations in area. 

All these treaties and organizations have been clubbed underneath a time period referred to as “House Legislation.” House legislation could be described because the physique of legislation governing space-related actions, which contains of quite a lot of worldwide agreements, treaties, conventions, and the United Nations Basic Meeting resolutions.[18] This in Worldwide Relations idea could be thought-about as a regime, which has been mentioned earlier. Additionally it is necessary to notice that a number of students have highlighted the idea of nations coming collectively, to cooperate and provoke area packages. The event of a particular area company that might take care of the area order and the equitable utilization and exploration of area actions has been talked about by totally different students.[19] All these factors in direction of the primary traits of the neo-liberal institutionalism, that’s the cooperation between the states and absolutely the positive aspects, which is the result of the cooperation between them. 

The House Age, which made its mark with the launch of Sputnik I in 1957, introduced out the hegemonic nature of the Chilly Conflict rivalry that existed at the moment. Via this one can simply determine the neo-realist perspective that prevailed throughout the starting of area explorations. The urge of competitors among the many nations, primarily the US of America and the Soviet Union, and the tense competitors that existed between them offers a really clear image of the neo-realist ideology that existed to start with. However with the evaluation that had been made above, it may be highlighted that the neo-liberal establishment had its deal with nationwide area insurance policies and the results of the worldwide organizations and regimes on this area. Students had been attempting to clarify the geopolitics of outer area underneath the neo-liberal ideology. By Could 1972, the US of America and the Soviet Union signed on the “Settlement  Regarding Cooperation within the Exploration and Use of Outer House for Peaceable Functions”, agreeing to cooperate in plenty of elements of area science.[20] Neo-liberalism in outer area explains the results of formal and casual space-related regimes, particularly amongst democracies, in addition to growing interdependence in area and spillover results from the area sector to different sectors.[21] Additionally via the commercialization of the area sector, extra potentialities for cooperation can be found. SpaceX collaborating with NASA of the US is an instance of this. Lately SpaceX even despatched NASA astronauts to area, which is main cooperation with the personal sector.[22] Equally, many area companies have been cooperating with one another for civilian functions just like the European House Company cooperating with China’s House Station for distant sensing referred to as the Dragon program.[23]

The worldwide regimes and organizations had a significant position in creating worldwide cooperation between the states within the area area. A serious driver of the event of neoliberalism within the Nineteen Eighties was the truth that the degrees of worldwide cooperation have been a lot greater than that could possibly be defined by neo-realism.[24] A number of students who use neo-liberal institutionalism in explaining the cooperation in outer area highlights that the worldwide organizations performed an necessary position within the operation of units of rules, norms, guidelines, and decision-making procedures. It also needs to be famous on this context that throughout the Nineteen Eighties, the idealist conception of a complete ban on navy area methods, which was a fable named “area demilitarization”, moved away to a extra neoliberal account aiming at constraining the navy use of area by selling inter-state cooperation and dedication in direction of regulatory treaties.[25] Even when all these cooperative actions and initiatives which have been carried out underneath a neo-liberal institutionalism framework, these days with the rise of actors within the outer area area and the gorgeous achievements of the manned and robotic area explorations, the hegemonic use of area has itself being dominating.[26]

The Outer House Treaty of 1967 is the primary formal regime for outer area. Many casual regimes have additionally been efficient within the cooperation of actors in outer area. With the institution of this treaty, outer area was thought-about as a “impartial area” and it was accepted as a website freed from nuclear weapons and different weapons of mass destruction. The regime that was established to coordinate the radio-frequency utilization between the satellite tv for pc customers is an instance of this. Radio frequencies that have been transmitted to Earth by the satellite tv for pc and the usage of the identical frequencies may lead to mutual communication disruption. To keep away from this interference between satellites, finally, a regime was established referred to as the Worldwide Telecommunication Union, which coordinates not solely the frequency utilization but in addition allocates orbital slots for every satellite tv for pc.[27] Thus, it may be thought-about that the outer area area has quite a bit that may be defined from a neoliberal perspective and nations need to cooperate on this area and needs to keep away from conflicts. 

Geopolitics of Outer area from a Neo-Realist perspective

Although there have been a number of methods to place a cooperative order within the outer area affairs, what the outer area as a website is witnessing as we speak, is the competitors between the nations. Be it relating to civilian packages or militarization and weaponization of area, each a part of the area is being contested as we speak. It also needs to be highlighted at this level that at first, the rivalry that the US and the Soviet Union had throughout the Chilly Conflict interval, acted as a catalyst in growing the area explorations, actions, and associated applied sciences that have been spiraling up. The 2 theories which have been formulated by the strategists, Everett Dolman and David Deudney relating to the geopolitics of outer area comprise extra emphasis on this context. Based on the speculation put forth by Everett Dolman, he argues that the nice powers are likely to dominate the Earth, via the aggressive mastery of outer area. [28] Within the article, “New Frontiers, Outdated Realities”, by Dolman, it has additionally talked about that the outer area is a website, the place the states aren’t able to compromise.[29] Identical to some other geopolitical theories of Mahan and Mackinder, Dolman considers, the area because the heartland. He argues that by gaining management over this heartland, the outer area, one can acquire management everywhere in the world. The opposite idea concerning the geopolitics of outer area by David Deudney talks about controlling area. He argues that efficient management over the area permits a state to realize, planet-wide hegemony, which is in response to Deudney, is extra highly effective and irresistible than the management over some other area.[30] Thus, it has made it very apparent that, although there are various cooperative actions that the nations have been concerned relating to the safety and secure utilization of outer area and its sources, the competitors between the nations within the area exists. 

Initially, the realist perspective was in a position to clarify the event of the House Age, which concerned the rivalry between the US and the Soviet Union. However in course of time, the neo-realist perspective offers a wider perspective about what is occurring within the outer area area. The absence of the world authorities and the elevated charge of the arms race in area by the nations creates a safety dilemma, which makes the opposite nations improve their very own safety underneath protection efforts which have been reputable and non-threatening. Quite the opposite, this one act of a state made the others hostile. From the classical realist perspective, the area race is defined by the competitors for energy between the superpowers, however the “energy” in query is a multifaceted amalgam of various forces starting from tangible navy functionality to unquantifiable levels of status.[31] On this level, it’s of a lot significance to notice that, throughout the Nineteen Fifties, the possession of the nuclear weapons by the nations, considerably maintained the stability of energy within the typical warfighting strategies, and due to this fact a superpower competitors in area grew as a lovely different in flaunting the relative energy capabilities of 1 nation. 

With the extent of alternatives and the growing significance of area within the lives of man, the inevitability and urge to regulate area, is a crucial stage of study. Additionally, the quantity of energy on Earth, {that a} state attains, via the management of area alone, is indispensable. This has been implied by the theories on outer area geopolitics as mentioned earlier, that area energy turns into a necessary foundation for gaining energy on Earth. If area management shapes the international coverage choices accessible to states on Earth, then such theorizing about area replaces or dietary supplements within the worldwide system herald an echelon of study among the many states, which is the very essence of the neo-realist idea.[32] The a number of insurance policies which have been adopted by the space-faring nations, implies that greater than cooperation, it’s the aggressive nature of the area area, that’s been most well-liked. The possession of ASAT functionality by a rustic itself is a step in direction of the weaponization of area. Being harmful in nature, possession of this functionality could be interpreted as both from an offensive realist perspective or a defensive realist perspective. Additionally, it must be highlighted right here that the US not too long ago gave out the information concerning the growth of an offensive area weapon, which could have created a potential safety dilemma amongst different space-faring nations.[33] Therefore, on analyzing the present development within the area of area, it may be argued that the neo-realist paradigm presents extra views into the way forward for these relationships that may exist in area. On this context, it is usually a lot necessary to debate that the neo-realist idea rethinks energy in its offensive and defensive elements, together with the circumstances underneath which states search safety in an anarchic setting by creating navy forces to discourage or defend in opposition to an adversary in addition to the extent and forms of capabilities which are deemed adequate to make sure one state’s safety with out threatening the opposite facet’s potential to discourage or defend.[34] 

Contemplating the present growth of outer area as a vital area of worldwide relations, the current area buildings which are nonetheless creating can transfer ahead with newer applied sciences and the rise of area energy is a significant risk. Kenneth Waltz in his e-book, Idea of Worldwide Politics argues that the anarchical construction of the worldwide system makes the states improve their safety via self-help and energy politics.[35] Even students like Mearsheimer has argued that anarchy forces state to maximise energy as a substitute of safety.37

It has been additionally talked about that Mearsheimer’s idea has been labeled offensive whereas Waltz’s idea has been thought-about defensive. Safety and survival are the best ends underneath anarchy and thru totally different ranges of energy, {that a} state poses, just like the navy, financial and different capabilities, safety could be made accessible. Authority within the anarchical worldwide system is expressed via the capabilities {that a} state possesses, and the states compete for energy to remain safe.[36] Offensive and defensive realism have its implications on the geopolitics of outer area. 

The present geopolitics of outer area highlights that the defensive neo-realism in area level in direction of the states looking for area safety in an anarchical outer area area. The states attempt to obtain this area safety via self-help and area energy politics. Regardless that area actions are frequent for all of the states in area, the quantity of area energy defines the state in area and therefore they compete for energy in area.[37] Let or not it’s a few area battle or area safety, the ability a state possesses in area is what issues even in response to the theories concerning the geopolitics of outer area. In defensive realism, the states have interaction in all actions that may be anticipated to stability in opposition to the dominant area energy. That’s defensive realism permits the states to attain a stability of energy in outer area. The growing variety of nations, who’re creating their scientific capabilities, to launch area autos from their nation could be defined a lot nicely from the attitude of defensive realism. A serious instance of this may be the ASAT capabilities which have been acquired by the space-faring nations. As of now, aside from the US, China, Russia, and India have demonstrated its ASAT capabilities. 

Once more, being opposite to this, the offensive realism means that anarchy in area, forces nice area powers, with some offensive area capabilities at their disposal, to maximise their area energy and purpose for area hegemony to guarantee their survival.[38] Having area area solely totally different from the presently present area on Earth and being nonetheless a creating area of geopolitics, offensive realism implies that the states can guarantee area hegemony by preserving their rivals from reaching the identical objectives as them. Latent area energy, within the type of cash, expertise and workforce is an integral part in offensive neo-realism in outer area.[39] The present improve within the arms race in outer area, which incorporates the ASAT checks, the ICBMs, and the a number of satellites and area autos which have been developed by nations, could be defined from the offensive neo-realist perspective. Even with all of the treaties and regimes present for the peaceable use of outer area sources, the nations try to extend their attain in area, via their enhancing applied sciences, and sources, from Earth. 


Outer area has been creating as a vital area of geopolitics over the previous many years. With the growing dependence on outer area for telecommunications, reconnaissance and surveillance, the significance, and the position of outer area within the lifetime of man is gaining a lot momentum. Right now, the event in area by a state has change into part of its nationwide curiosity. The facility the state positive aspects via these developments has change into a matter of the nation’s satisfaction. With the event of area and area actions carried out by the nations, many worldwide treaties and regimes have been established by world organizations and societies, for the peaceable use of outer area and its elements. However, in course of time, the evolution of area militarization and weaponization and the a number of theories which have been developed by students relating to the geopolitics of outer area. All of them have implied, instantly or not directly that, greater than cooperation between the nations in area, the management over the area by a rustic can provide the place of hegemony over the entire world. The present arms race in area and the growing variety of space-faring nations has created a picture for area as the following vital theatre for battle.

The neo-realist-neo-liberal debate is an present worldwide relations debate that has been evolving. Although they’re thought-about because of realism and liberalism, respectively of the worldwide relations idea, this debate has been concentrating on the anarchy of the worldwide system. Whereas neo-realist ideology focuses on the battle between the nations and gaining energy within the worldwide area, the neo-liberal institutionalists deal with cooperation between the states and the present in interdependence. Relative acquire and absolute acquire are the opposite two traits of the neo-realism and neo-liberalism. This ongoing debate when utilized to grasp the geopolitics of outer area brings in new views. The neoliberal rapprochement with neo-realism produced a view of worldwide relations through which states sought to develop and implement worldwide regimes primarily based on guidelines and legislation, even whereas “political outcomes proceed to be closely influenced by energy politics”.[40] 

Michael Sheehan in his article additionally argues that this dichotomy that’s current between the competitors and cooperation is of nice significance for the space-faring nations in relation to their international coverage pursuits in area. On analyzing the actions of nations in area, it may be argued that sure nations need to cooperate the place there may be extra absolute acquire, collectively and the remaining, desires to protect the present hegemonic place that they’ve by proscribing the cooperation in these areas, which is able to have an effect on their steady and predominant place in area. These area actions embrace the switch of expertise with necessary navy and industrial values, which might improve the capabilities of one other nation in area. Within the present context, it’s the US of America, that possess the best applied sciences and capabilities in area. With the US on one facet, nations like China and Russia would attempt to improve their present area expertise. This might immediate different nations to enter this realm of area expertise race or area arms race, regardless of the cooperative treaties and regimes which are present. Therefore, it may be concluded that the present Geopolitics of outer area could be interpreted a lot better via the neo-realism, than the neo-liberal establishment, underneath the neo-neo debate that exists. 

The geopolitics of outer area is dynamic and is a vital creating area. The present Worldwide Relations theories which are used to clarify the construction of outer area, could be changed by different theories sooner or later. The way forward for outer area could be both aggressive or cooperative in nature. Or the nations may even use the area area to create a defensive deterrence functionality between them. 


[1] Michael Sheehan, “Perceptions of House and Worldwide Political Idea”, The Worldwide Politics of House, (Routledge: USA, 2007), p. 7

[2] Cameron G. Thies, “Are Two Theories Higher than One? A Constructivist Mannequin of the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate”, Worldwide Political Science Assessment (US), v. 25, n. 2, 2004, p. 161 3 Neo-Neo Debate in Worldwide Relations, UK Essays, 11 August 2017, see web site https://www.ukessays.com/essays/politics/key-features-main-contributions-neo-neo-debate-politics-essay.php, accessed on 4 April 2020

[3] Tim Pfefferle, “The Neo-Neo Debate within the Worldwide Relations Idea”, E-Worldwide Relations, 9 January 2014, see web site https://www.eir.info/2014/01/09/theneoneodebateininternationalrelationstheoryprogressorregression/, accessed on 4 April 2020

[4] Ibid.

[5] Dominykas Broga, “What are the Key Components of the Neo-Neo Debate”, E-Worldwide Relations, 12 October 2012, see web site https://www.eir.info/2012/10/12/whatarethekeyelementsoftheneoneodebatewhatifanythingismissing/, accessed on 4 April 2020

[6] John J Mearsheimer, “Structural Realism”, in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds.), Worldwide Relations Idea (Oxford: UK, 2010), p. 83

[7] Ibid., p. 119-120

[8] n. 6 

[9] n. 7, p. 119

[10] n. 7, p. 120

[11] Neo-Realism v/s Neo-Liberalism: The “Neo-Neo” Debate, Professional essay, 16 march 2013, see web site https://www.proessay.com/neorealism-vs-neoliberalism-the-neo-neo-debate/, accessed on 4 April 2020

[12] n. 3

[13] Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou, “The Previous, Current and Way forward for Realism”, E-Worldwide Relations, 15

January 2018, see web site https://www.eir.info/2018/01/15/thepastpresentandfutureofrealism/, accessed on 7 April 2020

[14] Steven E. Lobell, “Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism”, in Nukhet Sandal, Renee Marlin-

Bennet et. al. (eds.), Oxford Analysis Encyclopaedia of Worldwide Research (Oxford, UK: 2010), p. 54

[15] “Stability of Energy”, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 5 November 2008, see web site https://www.britannica.com/topic/balanceofpower, accessed on 8 April 2020

[16] Anu Bradford, “Regime Idea”, Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public Worldwide Legislation (UK), February 2017, p. 1

[17] Ibid., p. 2

[18] House Legislation, Our Work, United Nations Workplace for Outer House Affairs, see web site https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/index.html, accessed on 3 April 2020

[19] Howard J. Taubenfeld, ‘Outer House- Previous Politics and Future Coverage”, Proceedings of the American Society of Worldwide Legislation at Its Annual Assembly (UK),v. 55, 1961, p. 179-180

[20] Michael Sheehan, “Worldwide Cooperation in House”, The Worldwide Politics of House (Routledge:

USA, 2007), p. 64

[21] Eirik Billingsø Elvevold, ““Conflict in House: Why Not?” A Neorealist Evaluation of Worldwide House Politics”, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Portugal), 2019, p. 29

[22] Alan Boyle, “Gentle this candle!’ SpaceX sends NASA astronauts on historic journey to area station in Dragon capsule”, Geek Wire, 30 Could 2020, see web site https://www.geekwire.com/2020/spacexnasaresetcountdownsecondtrylaunchfirstcreweddragon/, accessed on 2 April 2020

[23] “ESA’s Dragon cooperation with China prolonged to 2020”, European House Company, 8 July 2016, see web site https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/ESA_s_Dragon_cooperation_with_China_extended_to_ 2020, accessed on 2 April 2020

[24] n. 1, p. 14

[25] n. 1, p. 15

[26] n. 1, p. 13

[27] Jill Stuart, “Regime Idea and the research of Outer House Politics”, E-Worldwide Relations, 10 September 2013, see web site https://www.eir.info/2013/09/10/regimetheoryandthestudyofouterspacepolitics/, accessed on 7 April 2020

[28] Jonathan Havercroft and Raymond Duvall, “Crucial Astropolitics: The Geopolitics of House Management and the

Transformation of State Sovereignty”, in-Natalie Bormann and Michael Sheehan (eds.), Securing Outer House: Worldwide Relations Idea and the Politics of (Routledge: USA, 2009), p. 43

[29] Everett Carl Dolman, “New Frontiers, Outdated Realities”, Strategic Research Quarterly (US), v. 6, n.  1, 2012. p. 94

[30] n. 29, p. 43

[31] n. 1, p. 8

[32] Robert Pfaltzgraff, “Worldwide Relations Idea and House Energy” in Charles D Lutes and Peter L. Hays (eds.), Towards a Idea of Spacepower: Chosen Essays (Nationwide Protection College: Institute for Nationwide Strategic Research: US, 2017), p. 6

[33] Joseph Trevithick, “House Power Simply Acquired Its First New Offensive Weapon”, The Drive, 13 March 2020, see web site https://www.thedrive.com/thewarzone/32570/spaceforcejustreceiveditsfirstnewoffensiveweapon, accessed on 28 Could 2020

[34] n. 33, p. 7

[35] Kenneth Waltz, “The Administration of Worldwide Affairs”, Idea of Worldwide Politics (AddisonWesley: California, 1979), p. 195  37 n. 22, p. 38

[36] Kenneth Waltz, “Anarchic Buildings and Stability of Energy”, Idea of Worldwide Politics (AddisonWesley: California, 1979), p. 128

[37] n. 22, p. 45

[38] n. 22, p. 86

[39] n. 22, p. 38

[40] n. 1, p. 14

Written at: Manipal Academy for Greater Training, Manipal
Written for: Dr. Dhanashree Jayaram

Date written: Could 2020

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here